Do humans have the right to end their lives if terminally ill?

From my point of view a human has no right to end a life other than if it is really necessary. If the person is suffering, then why leave them alive? If we can end the suffering, I’m a strong believer that if it benefits the person than you should end with the person’s life. I believe this because I see it as an external reason why to terminate someone’s life, if the doctors have diagnosed the patient to be suffering and have no chance of living perfectly again, like when people are in coma, you could perfectly end a person’s life. As family and friends you suffer more than any patient in a coma does, or any patient who is suffering for which you should be able to decide for them if it’s ok to end their life. The only decision that would count would be your own judgment, since it’s the only one that really matters. The principal social basic ethic of the objectivism is that no man has the right to judge. Which means, that if you decide to end the life of someone who is terminally ill nobody can judge your opinion if you decide to end someone’s life. So in the end whose opinion counts is depending on what the doctor told you about the sickness and the family’s decision. So at the end it’s the person doing the action who knows if it was correct to do what she did. Nobody should judge your decision, no matter what.

-Ayn Rand (Alexa Bobadilla)